On May 15,
2012, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (USCIS) Administrative Appeals
Office (AAO) issued a binding precedent decision addressing the term
“culturally unique” and its significance in the adjudication of petitions for
performing artists and entertainers.
In the case at
issue, the Skirball Cultural Center
filed a P-3 nonimmigrant petition on behalf of a musical group from Argentina that
was denied a performing artists’ visa for failing to establish that the group’s
performance was “culturally unique” as required for this visa classification.
Due to the unusually complex and novel issue and the likelihood that the same
issue could arise in future decisions, the decision was recommended for review.
USCIS’s AAO
approved the petition after its review of the entire record, which included
expert written testimony and corroborating evidence on behalf of the musical
group. The regulatory definition of “culturally unique” requires USCIS to make
a case-by-case factual determination. The decision clarifies that a “culturally
unique” style of art or entertainment is not limited to traditional art forms,
but may include artistic expression that is deemed to be a hybrid or fusion of
more than one culture or region.
Precedent
decisions support USCIS’s commitment to consistency in the administration of
immigration benefits. This is the third precedent decision issued since late
2010. Selected and designated as precedent by the Secretary of the Department
of Homeland Security (DHS), with the Attorney General’s concurrence, precedent
decisions are administrative decisions that are legally binding on DHS
components responsible for enforcing immigration laws in all proceedings
involving the same issue.
The Department
of Justice’s Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) publishes precedent
decisions in bound volumes titled, “Administrative Decisions Under Immigration
and Nationality Laws of the United
States .”
No comments:
Post a Comment